TheVampireDante Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 2 hours ago, RianQuenlin said: The creator is controversial because of his attitude towards modding, people disagreeing with his changes, or mods that revert his changes. In addition, if people percieve someone as being "protected by the mods", exempt from the rules, or in a position of power or influence they shouldn't have, there will be animosity whenever it is true or not. If people don't like the work, or the people involved - then they shouldn't use it. They want to use something else that has it as a requirement? Then either tough luck, find an alternative that doesn't need it or learn to edit the dependencies out and hope it doesn't break the thing. Getting rude, negative, aggressive and/or offensive is only going to get one person in trouble - the one making the comment. As for "protected by the mods"? He gets the same treatment as anyone else on the recieving end of this sort of crap would get, nothing more, nothing less. Just happens to be a hell of a lot more in his case than most others due to the nature of the mod work involved, so it's more visible when acted on. That's all. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeyYou Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 16 minutes ago, TheVampireDante said: If people don't like the work, or the people involved - then they shouldn't use it. They want to use something else that has it as a requirement? Then either tough luck, find an alternative that doesn't need it or learn to edit the dependencies out and hope it doesn't break the thing. Getting rude, negative, aggressive and/or offensive is only going to get one person in trouble - the one making the comment. As for "protected by the mods"? He gets the same treatment as anyone else on the recieving end of this sort of crap would get, nothing more, nothing less. Just happens to be a hell of a lot more in his case than most others due to the nature of the mod work involved, so it's more visible when acted on. That's all. The price of fame. I agree with some of the posters points, just, not the way he presented them..... I don't use the unofficial patches, as he does indeed make changes I don't agree with..... I do NOT, however, go off on a nut, and a campaign of harassment against him. That's just stupid. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showler Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 He's also not just a "him". There's a team behind the Unofficial Patches and decisions are made by the team. He just takes the heat for being the lead and face. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticia01 Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 (edited) 9 hours ago, AlienSlof said: I've seen a lot of hate spewed at the unofficial patch for Ob Remastered, more than for the games it was made for before: What's wrong with people? I use this and it seems to have made my game a bit more stable. And all these idiots hating on a nude male Khajiit - 1 single male mod amidst 496754987627626748248 nude females, many that look deformed. These people need to get a grip and realise that we don't all dance to the same drum. I use the Unofficial Patches a lot in fact it were the first mods i downloaded. Because i can agree with their intentions/arguments. But like everywhere else in RL there can be other opinions with good arguments. Perhaps the reason that those people think women have deformed bodies is they haven't seen a nude one in their real life? Like Middle age people believe in savages in Africa with their eyes and mouth in their chest without a head? Edited May 3 by Morticia01 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lollia Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 Quote Can't exactly say I'm surprised about this one being banned. It was always more of a matter of when than if. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedHeadAngel Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 I feel bad for their son. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndalayBay Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 2 hours ago, Lollia said: Can't exactly say I'm surprised about this one being banned. It was always more of a matter of when than if. Finally. I automatically skipped this guy's posts a while ago. Got tired of the nonsensical rambling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticia01 Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 (edited) And the worst his walls of text are not funny. @RedHeadAngel There should be a parenting licence. And i have learned a new word proficient. Edited May 4 by Morticia01 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronOfMpls Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 21 hours ago, HeyYou said: I don't use the unofficial patches, as he does indeed make changes I don't agree with..... I do NOT, however, go off on a nut, and a campaign of harassment against him. That's just stupid. 15 hours ago, Morticia01 said: I use the Unofficial Patches a lot in fact it were the first mods i downloaded. Because i can agree with their intentions/arguments. But like everywhere else in RL there can be other opinions with good arguments. Yah, I've been using the Unofficial Patches almost since the beginning. Between mod dependencies and definite bugfixes, I find them far too useful to not have. But I also understand some disagreements with them too. Some changes are very much judgement calls of "Is this a bug or oversight, or was it meant to be this way?" that reasonable people can disagree over.* I wouldn't be surprised if on some bug fixes, reasonable people can disagree over whether the implementation was right. And though I'm running a current version of SE with no plans to downgrade, I do wish they'd kept a "last old version, unsupported" of the SE patch visible for downgraders -- though I can also understand why they don't. * Like NPCs whose stats don't match their gear and abilities. Many of them are genuine oversights where the devs never got around to setting them properly. But some are likely deliberate, given the NPC's characterization and backstory. And some could be reasonably argued either way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronOfMpls Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 7 hours ago, Lollia said: https://forums.nexusmods.com/topic/13514714-ilcomico-banned/ Can't exactly say I'm surprised about this one being banned. It was always more of a matter of when than if. 4 hours ago, AndalayBay said: Finally. I automatically skipped this guy's posts a while ago. Got tired of the nonsensical rambling. Indeed, IlComico always seemed at least a little off the deep end to me. Even when he(?) made reasonable points, he'd assume the worst motives too quickly. Plus he often wrote like a cryptic prophet, making it hard to follow him far enough to meet him halfway. I figure if you've got a point to make, then make it -- don't bury it in riddles like it's the Book of Revelation. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now